Sarah • Ringfeder: Torque — It's important to quickly identify the source for the highest system torques. Is it from the drive or from the driven inertia? Inertial torque is often ignored in the design phase on applications with torque reversals. This will cause the coupling to be sized too small and cause unnecessary down time.

Fatigue — In reversing applications, it's important to select a coupling that will not fatigue easily. Certain designs that are fine in smooth applications don't last long in reversing applications.

Torsional rigidity — If it's important to hold the torsional timing from one side of the coupling to the other, choose the coupling with the highest torsional stiffness. It may cost a bit more, but this will ensure the percentage of good parts manufactured is much higher.

Backlash — In motion-centric machines, backlash causes timing problems and eventual failures due to the hammering effect that occurs in reversing applications. Choose couplings without any backlash in the coupling or the connection between the shaft and hub.

Misalignment — The designer needs to be realistic about what misalignment can be maintained between the shafts for the life of the machine. If a coupling without sufficient misalignment capability is chosen, it can cause failures at the coupling or even the more expensive parts adjacent to the coupling.

The human factor — Get to know your end user or factory personnel. Which type of coupling do they prefer or have the most experience using? As long as the coupling is appropriate for the application, downtime will be significantly reduced by listening to those who have to use or maintain these couplings.

Coupling catastrophes

What's the worst that can happen if a coupling is not specified or installed correctly?

Bill • Rexnord: When couplings are not properly specified or applied, the consequences can be catastrophic. Parts and pieces may become projectiles, creating an unsafe condition for personnel and equipment. High speed coupling operation demands that enclosures be properly designed to contain all components and that the coupling design also contain the spacer section in the event of flexing element failure. Using flex element fasteners as the sole method of spacer retention is considered unacceptable.

Andrew • R+W: Limiting current to the drive isn't always enough to prevent damage in the event of a machine crash. It's important to remember that in high speed applications with high acceleration rates, a substantial amount of kinetic energy may already exist within the load and mechanical components at the time of impact. This is why servo-rated torque limiting couplings exist.

If, over time, bearings begin to wear and machinery no longer runs as smoothly as it once did, it's possible that torque limiters will begin to disengage due to the higher level of torque required to accelerate the load. This can frustrate production efforts, and occasionally technicians have been known to weld torque limiters together so that they never disengage. Stand back next time someone accidentally hits a hard stop.

Kevin • Zero-Max: If a coupling is misapplied, performance and life are dramatically affected. For example, when coupling torsional stiffness is too low, something in the system must be adjusted in order to accommodate the lower stiffness. Typically the servo gain is reduced, resulting in a slower system response. This will reduce the performance and productivity of a servo system. An often overlooked concept is the relationship between ultra high torsional stiffness and the ability to withstand high speed reversing loads. If a coupling has ultra high torsional stiffness, the coupling is often brittle. A balanced approach is needed in high performance systems.

If a coupling is not properly selected or installed correctly, a catastrophic coupling failure may occur. An improperly aligned coupling can increase reaction load on the connected shafting, which can cause premature bearing, shaft, and/or coupling failure. Due to the high peak torque and smaller shaft diameters of today's servo systems, the shaft connection is increasingly important. To avoid slippage, an adequate shaft connection must be selected. Failure to review the shaft connection can result in coupling slippage on a keyless shaft, which may result in loss of machine timing and galling of the shaft and/or coupling hub.

Robert • Ruland: Here's a bad idea — using a rigid coupling to replace a flexible servo coupling when misalignment is the underlying problem. We receive many inquiries for rigid couplings, with customers telling us they keep breaking flexible types. They believe that by going to the very strong rigid type it will solve their problem. Rigid couplings can only be used when the shafts are in perfect alignment. If a rigid coupling is installed in an application where misalignment is present, the forces applied by the rigid coupling to the surrounding components can be extreme.

It would not be unusual for a rigid coupling mounted between a misaligned servomotor and a linear actuator to destroy both expensive components. We once heard about a $4,000 precision gearbox and $2,000 servomotor both destroyed by using a rigid coupling to connect them without perfect alignment. If frequent coupling failure is a problem, do the following: Check the alignment of the shafts to be sure it is within the limits of the coupling being used, and check the speed, torque, and misalignment of the system to be sure that the proper coupling type and size are being used.

Sarah • Ringfeder: The worst-case scenario is when the machine does not work properly and many months or even years go by fighting with it, because the right coupling was never used. One experience we had involved a coupling on a machine that flipped pick-up tailgates from one conveyor to another. The company that designed the machine based the coupling size on the torque from the motor and gearbox. In actuality, the highest torque occurred when the drive tried to lift the inertia of the tailgate. This value was much higher and the coupling bolts basically ripped through the center spacer sleeve. In order to keep running, the customer brazed the spacer back together. In the end, they needed a coupling at least two sizes larger.

The perfect coupling

If you could create the ideal coupling, what would it look like? What would it do?

Bill • Rexnord: The ideal coupling would have no wearing parts, would not require lubrication, would be easily assembled, have an infinite operating life, have no fasteners, and be low cost. Maybe it will drive the perpetual motion machine some day.

Andrew • R+W: The ideal servo coupling would be weightless, corrosion proof, and present zero resistance to any misalignment. It would limit torque to an ideal value, tell you what that value is, and adjust itself automatically. It would have the ability to damp vibration but also be infinitely torsionally rigid, and not make any noise. While we're at it, how about free of cost?

Kevin • Zero-Max: A future servo coupling must have the following traits: Durable and reliable design; zero backlash; high torsional stiffness without being brittle; low inertia; high misalignment capacity (angular, parallel, and axial); large bore capacity; compact design to fit in a variety of installations; and a choice of shaft mounting configurations.

Robert • Ruland: The perfect coupling would feature zero windup, zero reactionary forces, zero inertia, an adjustable length, torsional stiffness, dampening/shock absorbing and electrically isolating qualities, and would offer tool-free installation.

Sarah • Ringfeder: The perfect coupling for motion-centric machines would be torsionally rigid to 109 lb-in./rad, allow 0 to 0.25 in. of parallel misalignment without any problems, always be in stock, and cost nothing. For simplicity, I picture a flexible tube that can be expanded around each shaft, is stiff in torsion, flexible in bending, and durable against fatigue.

Industry expertise

Bill Ryan

Rexnord LLC
rexnord.com
(414) 643-3000

Andrew Lechner

R+W America
rw-america.com
(888) 479-8728

Kevin Wells

Zero-Max Inc.
zero-max.com
(800) 533-1731

Robert Watkins

Ruland Manufacturing Co. Inc.
ruland.com
(508) 485-1000

Sarah McChesney

Ringfeder Corp.
ringfeder.com
(201) 666-3320